S&P 500 Over the Long Haul: Connecting the Dots
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 2:35 pm
Courtesy of Doug Short
Technical analyst Chris Kimble takes a long look at the S&P 500 and asks whether we’re at a major price point suggested by a resistance line that dates from the mid-1980s.
Chris comments: The 1987 highs and the 2002-2003 lows were important price points in history.
A key resistance line, drawn from these to key dates, is coming into play right now in the S&P 500 index.
Is this line the reason the index has been down of late? Too early to tell, yet worth watching!
For the most up-to-date Kimble analysis, check out Chris’s blog: Kimble Charting Solutions.
Could the 1987 highs and 2002/03 lows be impacting the 500 index now?
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 1:06 pm
Courtesy of Chris Kimble
CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE
Did the 500 index peak the week of 2/19 because of the resistance line in the above chart? I doubt it! The 1987 high and the 2002/03 lows are two very key price points over the past three decades. Keep a close eye on this line and the price action that takes place at (3)!
The ECRI Weekly Leading Growth Index Up Slightly
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 12:35 pm
Courtesy of Doug Short
The Published Record
The published ECRI WLI growth metric has had a respectable record for forecasting recessions and rebounds therefrom. The next chart shows the correlation between the WLI, GDP and recessions.
A significant decline in the WLI has been a leading indicator for six of the seven recessions since the 1960s. It lagged one recession (1981-1982) by nine weeks. The WLI did turned negative 17 times when no recession followed, but 14 of those declines were only slightly negative (-0.1 to -2.4) and most of them reversed after relatively brief periods.
Three other three negatives were deeper declines. The Crash of 1987 took the Index negative for 68 weeks with a trough of -6.8. The Financial Crisis of 1998, which included the collapse of Long Term Capital Management, took the Index negative for 23 weeks with a trough of -4.5.
The third significant negative came near the bottom of the bear market of 2000-2002, about nine months after the brief recession of 2001. At the time, the WLI seemed to be signaling a double-dip recession, but the economy and market accelerated in tandem in the spring of 2003, and a recession was avoided.
The Latest WLI Decline
The question had been whether the WLI decline that began the the Q4 of 2009 was a leading indicator of a recession. The published index has never dropped to the -11.0 level in July 2010 without the onset of a recession. The deepest decline without a recession onset was in the Crash of 1987, when the index slipped to -6.8. The ECRI managing director correctly predicted that we would avoid a double dip. The latest GDP for Q4 of 2010, revised down slightly to 2.8, confirms the ECRI stance.
The WLI Versus Other Macroeconomic Indicators
For additional perspective on the performance of this indicator, see Comparing the ECRI Weekly Leading Index with Two Key Competitors, which highlights the curious behavor of the WLI following the 2008 Financial Crisis.
The ECRI Weekly Leading Index appears to be more sensitive to upturns than either the Philly Fed’s ADS Business Conditions Index (ADS) or the Chicago Fed’s Current Activity Index.
Silver update…
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 12:08 pm
Courtesy of Chris Kimble
CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE
Silver monthly is still dealing with its all-time highs at (1). SLV daily has been soft of late, yet not broken key support.
Game Plan…We remain overweight SLV right now! Will plan on harvesting the overweight position in SLV if key support is broken. Keep in mind if Silver can get a few percentage above the highs at (1), it could really move a good deal higher!
Deflation/Trend Reversal update…
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 11:23 am
Courtesy of Chris Kimble
On 2/24 I mentioned that rear view mirror investing was rather easy, seeing around the corner/what lies ahead, is a little tougher. Yet if we can find tools to help us with the direction of future price movements, it can be very beneficial to our portfolios. I discovered over 15-years ago that the “Power of the Pattern” can be very beneficial in pinpointing key reversals and points of exhaustion!
In the 2/24 post I mentioned that the “Power of the Pattern” was suggesting “Deflation/Lower prices” looked to be around the corner and that “key trend reversals looked to be in store!” (see post here).
CLICK ON CHART TO ENLARGE
The above 6-pack reflects that a wide variety of assets have broken key support lines after creating patterns, that were suggesting “trend reversals” looked to be in our future.
Game Plan…We took positions to score on defense, with stops in play should the trends reverse higher. The across the board breaking of support, in my opinion, should not be taken lightly!
Broad market/S&P 500 ….1,300 remains a key line in the sand. (see lucky 13 posting) Should 1,300 be taken out by a few percent to the downside, the gains in inverse ETF’s could become fairly large! Key broad market SUPPORT at the 1,300 level is STILL IN PLACE
At this time we are looking for relative weakness in Basic materials, Oil and Tech, with ownership of SMN, DUG & PSQ.
Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index Falls Sharply
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 10:35 am
Courtesy of Doug Short
The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index preliminary report for March came in at 68.2, down from 77.5 in February and a stunning reversal from the recent trend of improving sentiment. The Briefing.com consensus expectation had been for 76.5 and Briefing.com’s own forecast was for 78.0.
The survey’s measure of current economic conditions dropped to 83.6, from 86.9 the month before. Consumer expectations fell to 58.3 from 71.6, the lowest level since March 2009.
Consumer inflation expectation rose to 4.6 percent from 3.4 percent in February, the highest since August 2008. The 5-10-year inflation outlook rose to 3.2 percent from 2.9 percent. The increase in gasoline prices was no doubt a factor.
See the chart below for a long-term perspective on this widely watched index. Because the sentiment index has trended upward since its inception in 1978, I’ve added a linear regression to help understand the pattern of reversion to the trend. I’ve also highlighted recessions and included real GDP to help evaluate the Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index as an indicator of the broader economy.
To put today’s report into the larger historical context since its beginning in 1978, consumer sentiment is about 21% below the average reading (arithmetic mean), 20% below the geometric mean, and 22% below the regression line on the chart above. The current index level is at the 13th percentile of the 399 monthly data points in this series.
For the sake of comparison here is a chart of the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index (monthly update here). The Conference Board Index is the more volatile of the two, but the general pattern and trend are remarkably similar to the Michigan Index.
And finally, the prevailing mood of the Michigan survey is also similar to the mood of small business owners, as captured by the NFIB Business Optimism Index (monthly update here).
Consumer and small business sentiment remains at or near levels associated with other recent recessions, but the trend has been one of strong improvement. We now must wonder if the latest Michigan reading foreshadows a reversal in other sentiment indicators.
February Retail Sales
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 9:35 am
Courtesy of Doug Short
The February 2011 Advance Monthly Sales for Retail Trade and Food Services Report for February was released this morning. Here is the summary from the report:
| The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for February, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $387.1 billion, an increase of 1.0 percent (±0.5%) from the previous month, and 8.9 percent (±0.7%) above February 2010. Total sales for the December 2010 through February 2011 period were up 8.2 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago. The December 2010 to January 2011 percent change was revised from +0.3 percent (±0.5%)* to +0.7 percent (±0.3%).
Retail trade sales were up 0.9 percent (±0.5%) from January 2011, and 9.5 percent (±0.7%) above last year. Auto and other motor vehicle dealers sales were up 25.9 percent (±2.5%) from February 2010 and gasoline stations sales were up 12.9 percent (±1.7%) from last year. |
The 1.0% number is on target with the Briefing.com consensus estimate but shy of Briefing.com’s own optimistic 1.4% forecast.
The chart below shows the complete data series from 1992, when the U.S. Census Bureau began tracking the data. I’ve highlighted recessions and the approximate range of two major economic episodes that have impacted consumer attitudes. The Tech Crash that began in the spring of 2000 had little impact on consumption. The Financial Crisis of 2008 has had a major impact. The January retail sales take us in nominal terms a mere 0.4% above the previous high of November 2007.
Here is the same chart with two trendlines added. These are linear regressions computed with the Excel Growth function.
The green trendline is a regression through the entire data series. The latest sales figure is 7.0% below the green line end point.
The blue line is a regression through the end of 2007 and extrapolated to the present. Thus, the blue line…
Euro/Dollar Spread: Bad News for Stocks and Commodities?
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 12:35 am
Courtesy of Doug Short
Technical analyst Chris Kimble updates his analysis of the Euro/Dollar spread with an observation of the possible impact on a couple of key asset classes.
Chris comments: The power of the pattern is suggesting a Dollar rally and a Euro decline.
In the past this has often foreshadowed lower stock and commodity prices.
If the pattern is correct, look how vulnerable commodities are in the CRB/FCX chart!
For the most up-to-date Kimble analysis, check out Chris’s blog: Kimble Charting Solutions.
The Q Ratio: Updated with Latest Federal Reserve Data
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 12:35 am
Courtesy of Doug Short
Note from dshort: This update incorporates the new Federal Reserve Flow of Funds Z.1 data released earlier today.
The Q Ratio is a popular method of estimating the fair value of the stock market developed by Nobel Laureate James Tobin. It’s a fairly simple concept, but laborious to calculate. The Q Ratio is the total price of the market divided by the replacement cost of all its companies. Fortunately, the government does the work of accumulating the data for the calculation. The numbers are supplied in the Federal Reserve Z.1 Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States, which is released quarterly.
The first chart shows Q Ratio from 1900 to the present. I’ve extrapolated the ratio since the latest Fed data (through 2010 Q4) based on a combination of the price of VTI, the Vanguard Total Market ETF, and an extrapolation of the Z.1 data itself.
Interpreting the Ratio
The data since 1945 is a simple calculation using data from the Federal Reserve Z.1 Statistical Release, section B.102., Balance Sheet and Reconciliation Tables for Nonfinancial Corporate Business. Specifically it is the ratio of Line 35 (Market Value) divided by Line 32 (Replacement Cost). It might seem logical that fair value would be a 1:1 ratio. But that has not historically been the case. The explanation, according to Smithers & Co. (more about them later) is that “the replacement cost of company assets is overstated. This is because the long-term real return on corporate equity, according to the published data, is only 4.8%, while the long-term real return to investors is around 6.0%. Over the long-term and in equilibrium, the two must be the same.”
The average (arithmetic mean) Q ratio is about 0.71. In the chart below I’ve adjusted the Q Ratio to an arithmetic mean of 1 (i.e., divided the ratio data points by the average). This gives a more intuitive sense to the numbers. For example, the all-time Q Ratio high at the peak of the Tech Bubble was 1.82 — which suggests that the market price was 158% above the historic average of replacement cost. The all-time lows in 1921, 1932 and 1982 were around 0.30, which is about 57% below replacement cost. That’s quite…
S&P 500 Closes Below Its 50-Day Moving Average
by Chart School - March 11th, 2011 12:35 am
Courtesy of Doug Short
The S&P 500 closed the day down 1.89%, which puts it below its 50-day moving average for the first time since October 1, 2010. The index is 91.4% above the March 9 2009 closing low, which puts it 17.3% below the nominal all-time high of October 2007.
For a better sense of how these declines figure into a larger historical context, here’s a long-term view of secular bull and bear markets in the S&P Composite since 1871.
For a bit of international flavor, here’s a chart series that includes an overlay of the S&P 500, the Dow Crash of 1929 and Great Depression, and the so-called L-shaped “recovery” of the Nikkei 225. I update these weekly.
These charts are not intended as a forecast but rather as a way to study the current market in relation to historic market cycles.


del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Yahoo



























Philip R. Davis is a founder Phil's Stock World, a stock and options trading site that teaches the art of options trading to newcomers and devises advanced strategies for expert traders...
Ilene is editor and affiliate program
coordinator for PSW. She manages the Favorites backup site
(